Get Example source ABAP code based on a different SAP table
ARTICLE
Assigning Fields Dynamically In previous releases, in the MOVE-CORRESPONDING struc1 TO struc2 statement, the field types of both structures had to be known to the compiler. This constraint no longer applies under Unicode. In a non-Unicode system until now, there was no problem assigning structures with different Unicode fragment views using a MOVE statement. In a Unicode system, such assignments will cause a runtime error, even if both structures start with the same types:
Example BEGIN OF struc1, BEGIN OF struc2, a(2) TYPE C, a(2) TYPE C, b TYPE I, b TYPE I, c(1) TYPE C, c(1) TYPE C, d(4) TYPE X, g(6) TYPE P, END OF struc 1. f(2) TYPE X, END OF struc 2. struc1: | aaaa | bbbb | cc | dddd | struc2: | aaaa | bbbb | cc | gggggg | ff | For example, the content of struc2-[a,c] (which starts with fields of the same type) is assigned to struc1. Until now, you could use a simple MOVE statement (although this could mean that the remainder of struc1 subsequently did not contain meaningful values). However, in Unicode, you must use For example, the content of struc2-[a,c] (which starts with fields of the same type) is assigned to struc1. Until now, you could use a simple MOVE statement (although this could mean that the remainder of struc1 subsequently did not contain meaningful values). However, in Unicode, you must the MOVE-CORRESPONDING struc2 TO struc1; otherwise, a runtime error occurs (because you are attempting to MOVE struc2 to a structure with a different fragment view). You obtain the same result in Unicode, if the field names of the start of both structures are identical at runtime.
